Automated mainline railway operation is challenging the traditional role of the operational staff ensuring safe and punctual service. Nevertheless, there are sound operational, economic, regulatory and societal reasons for valuing and maintaining central contributions of human staff to railway operation in future automated service. Instead of a linear transferal of tasks from the human to the automation technology a human-machine collaboration setting becomes apparent that enables both, automation-driven benefits in terms of capacity or energy consumption and benefits in terms of efficient human intervention in case of operational uncertainty, where human decision-making and communication skills are key to safety.
HOFs in practice
About this topic
Introduction
The human factors discipline provides a theoretical knowledge base which can be applied to optimise systems for safety, human performance and wellbeing. These theory, principles, and methods can be applied in at different stages of the lifecycle, from conceptual design of new systems through to their operation and decommissioning. The practical application of HOF also applies to different parts of an organisation from frontline operational staff through to senior management.
Relevance to Rail
There are many areas of application for HOF in rail; examples are the application of HOF principles to the design of cabs or traffic management systems, and the design of alarms. Applying HOF in cases such as these helps to identify where safety and performance issues could arise during operation, and design those issues out as much as possible. Maintenance activities are critical to the operation of the railway and HOF methods and approaches can help ensure that maintenance tasks and activities are designed to account for human limitations and capabilities. A very specific area of application for rail is the understanding and mitigation of SPAD risk, particularly through identification of some of the factors that influence SPADs.
Approaches and models
The key principles of applying ergonomics and human factors can be found in ISO-26800 and are:
- An ergonomics approach to design shall be human-centred
- The target population shall be identified and described
- Design shall take full account of the nature of the task and its implications for the human
- The physical, organisational, social, and legal environments in which a system, product, service or facility is intended to be used shall be identified and described, and their range defined.
Automation Myth Busting Paper#3 Automation and mental workload
Automation paradoxically has the potential to both increase and decrease mental workload, depending on the circumstances. Furthermore, decreasing workload can actually put an operator into an underload state, which is just as bad for performance as overload. We have learned these lessons in the aviation and, more recently, automotive industries; as accident reports demonstrate, we are now starting to see their impact on the railway with the introduction of Automatic Train Operation and other automated systems. The key in helping an operator to work at their best is to find a way to optimise their mental workload – which may mean thinking differently about automation.
Automation Myth Busting Paper#4 Teaming between humans and automation
Due to technological advances, automation is nowadays no longer regarded only as a tool for humans but, due to the execution of complex tasks, is increasingly discussed in terms of a team member. This article describes how successful teaming can optimally be realized so that the strengths of the human operator and the automation are brought to bear. The decisive factor is a human-centred work design that focuses on the needs of human operators. An example from air traffic control is used and findings are transferred to the handling of existing interlocking technologies in the rail industry. First tendencies of teamwork between signallers and automation are already emerging today. In the future, this new form of teamwork can be further developed with the help of the introduced model on the key aspects for a successful teaming between humans and automation.
How to use the SPAD toolbox – RSSB
https://www.rssb.co.uk/what-we-do/key-industry-topics/spad-good-practice-guide/how-drivers-can-manage-spad-risk/how-to-use-the-spad-toolbox
SPAD Good Practice Guide – RSSB
https://www.rssb.co.uk/what-we-do/key-industry-topics/spad-good-practice-guide
Mühl, K. (2021). Automated Railway – Operation as Usual: Best Practice to Achieve Situational Awareness. Automation myth busting series
Abstract This article aims to provide insights into achieving situational awareness as a basis for safe automated railway operations. Automation in rail transport has a significant influence on employees' situational...
Safety Reporting at Renfe
What are the key HOF issues? The Strategic Plan of Renfe contains an ambitious transformation programme based on digitalisation and safety culture. A key aspect of the programme is the development of a confidential...
Evaluation of Human Performance – RSSB
What are the key HOF issues? Despite the ongoing efforts from industry to improve safety and performance, there is an indication that we are now seeing diminishing returns in investments into improvements that the rail...
Capturing detailed Human Factors causal data for SPAD events – RSSB
What are the key HOF issues? The Safety Management Intelligence System, known to many as SMIS, is the rail industry’s on-line health and safety reporting and business intelligence software. It collects and provides...
HOF in SPADs at Irish Rail
What are the key HOF issues? The immediate cause of signals passed at danger is often a lapse in concentration by a driver on approach to the signal. This can mean that the obvious focus for an investigation is on the...
ISO: 26800:2011 Ergonomics – General approach, principles and concepts
https://www.iso.org/standard/42885.html
EN 62682 (2015). Management of alarms systems for the process industries
https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/clc/dcee95c4-bf97-4af1-87d3-27e8b34ae480/en-62682-2015
UIC 651 Layout of driver’s cabs in locomotives, railcars, multiple trains and driving trailers
https://www.shop-etf.com/en/layout-of-driver-s-cabs-in-locomotives-railcars-multiple-unit-trains-and-driving-trailers
ISO 9241 – 303: 2011 Ergonomics of human-system interaction – part 303: requirements for electronic visual displays
https://www.iso.org/standard/57992.html
EN 16186 Parts 1 – 4 Railway applications – Driver’s cab
https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/7fb7d01f-4ddd-40e9-a390-0ed2e86ba3c0/en-16186-4-2019
Bainbridge, L. (1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19(6), 775-779.
Abstract This paper discusses the ways in which automation of industrial processes may expand rather than eliminate problems with the human operator. Some comments will be made on methods of alleviating these problems...
Flemisch et al, “Towards a dynamic balance between humans and automation: authority, ability, responsibility and control in shared and cooperative control situations”, Cogn Tech Work (2012) 14:3–18
Abstract: Progress enables the creation of more automated and intelligent machines with increasing abilities that open up new roles between humans and machines. Only with a proper design for the resulting cooperative...
CIEHF: Human Factors in Highly Automated Systems
https://ergonomics.org.uk/resource/human-factors-in-highly-automated-systems-white-paper.html
Network Rail: Human Factors Challenges of Automation in Railway Control
https://www.era.europa.eu/sites/default/files/events-news/docs/11_mike_carey_human_factors_challenges_automation_en.pdf
Systra: Traffic Management Systems (TMS) Implementation at Home and Abroad
https://www.systra.com.au/en/newsroom/article/traffic-management-systems-tms-implementation-at-home-and-abroad
Ministry of Defence: Human Factors Integration for Defence Systems
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1061681/JSP912_Part_2.pdf
Gibson, H. (2016). Industry Human Factors SPAD Review: Project Summary Report. London: RSSB.
https://www.sparkrail.org/Lists/Records/DispForm.aspx?ID=22779
Reason, J. (1997) Managing the risk of organisational accidents. Ashgate: Farnham.
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315543543/managing-risks-organizational-accidents-james-reason
RSSB guide on applying Human Factors to Improve Performance
https://www.rssb.co.uk/safety-and-health/improving-safety-health-and-wellbeing/understanding-human-factors/applying-human-factors-to-improve-performance RSSB
Crescencio. A, Martinez. O, Alban Millan. R (2022), “Human error analysis at Valencia railway operation control. Training proposal aimed at reducing human error”
Abstract: The objective of this paper is to present the human factors training methodology in Adif and its theoretical bases. This methodology represents a different way of understanding safety, more focused on what to...
Human and Organisational Factors (HOF) in Railway Automation
Human and Organisational Factors (HOF) in Railway Automation
Automation Myth Busting Paper#2 The Changing Role of Staff in Automated Railway Operation and why Human Cognition is Here to Stay
Automated mainline railway operation is challenging the traditional role of the operational staff ensuring safe and punctual service. Nevertheless, there are sound operational, economic, regulatory and societal reasons for valuing and maintaining central contributions of human staff to railway operation in future automated service. Instead of a linear transferal of tasks from the human to the automation technology a human-machine collaboration setting becomes apparent that enables both, automation-driven benefits in terms of capacity or energy consumption and benefits in terms of efficient human intervention in case of operational uncertainty, where human decision-making and communication skills are key to safety.
Automation Myth Busting Paper#3 Automation and mental workload
Automation paradoxically has the potential to both increase and decrease mental workload, depending on the circumstances. Furthermore, decreasing workload can actually put an operator into an underload state, which is just as bad for performance as overload. We have learned these lessons in the aviation and, more recently, automotive industries; as accident reports demonstrate, we are now starting to see their impact on the railway with the introduction of Automatic Train Operation and other automated systems. The key in helping an operator to work at their best is to find a way to optimise their mental workload – which may mean thinking differently about automation.
Automation Myth Busting Paper#4 Teaming between humans and automation
Due to technological advances, automation is nowadays no longer regarded only as a tool for humans but, due to the execution of complex tasks, is increasingly discussed in terms of a team member. This article describes how successful teaming can optimally be realized so that the strengths of the human operator and the automation are brought to bear. The decisive factor is a human-centred work design that focuses on the needs of human operators. An example from air traffic control is used and findings are transferred to the handling of existing interlocking technologies in the rail industry. First tendencies of teamwork between signallers and automation are already emerging today. In the future, this new form of teamwork can be further developed with the help of the introduced model on the key aspects for a successful teaming between humans and automation.
How to use the SPAD toolbox – RSSB
https://www.rssb.co.uk/what-we-do/key-industry-topics/spad-good-practice-guide/how-drivers-can-manage-spad-risk/how-to-use-the-spad-toolbox
SPAD Good Practice Guide – RSSB
https://www.rssb.co.uk/what-we-do/key-industry-topics/spad-good-practice-guide
Mühl, K. (2021). Automated Railway – Operation as Usual: Best Practice to Achieve Situational Awareness. Automation myth busting series
Abstract This article aims to provide insights into achieving situational awareness as a basis for safe automated railway operations. Automation in rail transport has a significant influence on employees' situational awareness (perception, understanding...
Safety Reporting at Renfe
What are the key HOF issues? The Strategic Plan of Renfe contains an ambitious transformation programme based on digitalisation and safety culture. A key aspect of the programme is the development of a confidential reporting system of near misses that...
Evaluation of Human Performance – RSSB
What are the key HOF issues? Despite the ongoing efforts from industry to improve safety and performance, there is an indication that we are now seeing diminishing returns in investments into improvements that the rail industry makes. It is important...
Capturing detailed Human Factors causal data for SPAD events – RSSB
What are the key HOF issues? The Safety Management Intelligence System, known to many as SMIS, is the rail industry’s on-line health and safety reporting and business intelligence software. It collects and provides access to information on thousands of...
HOF in SPADs at Irish Rail
What are the key HOF issues? The immediate cause of signals passed at danger is often a lapse in concentration by a driver on approach to the signal. This can mean that the obvious focus for an investigation is on the actions (or inactions) of the...
ISO: 26800:2011 Ergonomics – General approach, principles and concepts
https://www.iso.org/standard/42885.html
EN 62682 (2015). Management of alarms systems for the process industries
https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/clc/dcee95c4-bf97-4af1-87d3-27e8b34ae480/en-62682-2015
UIC 651 Layout of driver’s cabs in locomotives, railcars, multiple trains and driving trailers
https://www.shop-etf.com/en/layout-of-driver-s-cabs-in-locomotives-railcars-multiple-unit-trains-and-driving-trailers
ISO 9241 – 303: 2011 Ergonomics of human-system interaction – part 303: requirements for electronic visual displays
https://www.iso.org/standard/57992.html
EN 16186 Parts 1 – 4 Railway applications – Driver’s cab
https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/7fb7d01f-4ddd-40e9-a390-0ed2e86ba3c0/en-16186-4-2019
Bainbridge, L. (1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19(6), 775-779.
Abstract This paper discusses the ways in which automation of industrial processes may expand rather than eliminate problems with the human operator. Some comments will be made on methods of alleviating these problems within the ‘classic’ approach of...
Flemisch et al, “Towards a dynamic balance between humans and automation: authority, ability, responsibility and control in shared and cooperative control situations”, Cogn Tech Work (2012) 14:3–18
Abstract: Progress enables the creation of more automated and intelligent machines with increasing abilities that open up new roles between humans and machines. Only with a proper design for the resulting cooperative human–machine systems, these...
CIEHF: Human Factors in Highly Automated Systems
https://ergonomics.org.uk/resource/human-factors-in-highly-automated-systems-white-paper.html
Network Rail: Human Factors Challenges of Automation in Railway Control
https://www.era.europa.eu/sites/default/files/events-news/docs/11_mike_carey_human_factors_challenges_automation_en.pdf
Systra: Traffic Management Systems (TMS) Implementation at Home and Abroad
https://www.systra.com.au/en/newsroom/article/traffic-management-systems-tms-implementation-at-home-and-abroad
Ministry of Defence: Human Factors Integration for Defence Systems
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1061681/JSP912_Part_2.pdf
Gibson, H. (2016). Industry Human Factors SPAD Review: Project Summary Report. London: RSSB.
https://www.sparkrail.org/Lists/Records/DispForm.aspx?ID=22779
Reason, J. (1997) Managing the risk of organisational accidents. Ashgate: Farnham.
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315543543/managing-risks-organizational-accidents-james-reason
RSSB guide on applying Human Factors to Improve Performance
https://www.rssb.co.uk/safety-and-health/improving-safety-health-and-wellbeing/understanding-human-factors/applying-human-factors-to-improve-performance RSSB
Crescencio. A, Martinez. O, Alban Millan. R (2022), “Human error analysis at Valencia railway operation control. Training proposal aimed at reducing human error”
Abstract: The objective of this paper is to present the human factors training methodology in Adif and its theoretical bases. This methodology represents a different way of understanding safety, more focused on what to do and what to know than how to do...
Human and Organisational Factors (HOF) in Railway Automation
Human and Organisational Factors (HOF) in Railway Automation
Automation Myth Busting Paper#2 The Changing Role of Staff in Automated Railway Operation and why Human Cognition is Here to Stay
Automated mainline railway operation is challenging the traditional role of the operational staff ensuring safe and punctual service. Nevertheless, there are sound operational, economic, regulatory and societal reasons for valuing and maintaining central contributions of human staff to railway operation in future automated service. Instead of a linear transferal of tasks from the human to the automation technology a human-machine collaboration setting becomes apparent that enables both, automation-driven benefits in terms of capacity or energy consumption and benefits in terms of efficient human intervention in case of operational uncertainty, where human decision-making and communication skills are key to safety.
Automation Myth Busting Paper#3 Automation and mental workload
Automation paradoxically has the potential to both increase and decrease mental workload, depending on the circumstances. Furthermore, decreasing workload can actually put an operator into an underload state, which is just as bad for performance as overload. We have learned these lessons in the aviation and, more recently, automotive industries; as accident reports demonstrate, we are now starting to see their impact on the railway with the introduction of Automatic Train Operation and other automated systems. The key in helping an operator to work at their best is to find a way to optimise their mental workload – which may mean thinking differently about automation.
Automation Myth Busting Paper#4 Teaming between humans and automation
Due to technological advances, automation is nowadays no longer regarded only as a tool for humans but, due to the execution of complex tasks, is increasingly discussed in terms of a team member. This article describes how successful teaming can optimally be realized so that the strengths of the human operator and the automation are brought to bear. The decisive factor is a human-centred work design that focuses on the needs of human operators. An example from air traffic control is used and findings are transferred to the handling of existing interlocking technologies in the rail industry. First tendencies of teamwork between signallers and automation are already emerging today. In the future, this new form of teamwork can be further developed with the help of the introduced model on the key aspects for a successful teaming between humans and automation.
How to use the SPAD toolbox – RSSB
https://www.rssb.co.uk/what-we-do/key-industry-topics/spad-good-practice-guide/how-drivers-can-manage-spad-risk/how-to-use-the-spad-toolbox
SPAD Good Practice Guide – RSSB
https://www.rssb.co.uk/what-we-do/key-industry-topics/spad-good-practice-guide
Mühl, K. (2021). Automated Railway – Operation as Usual: Best Practice to Achieve Situational Awareness. Automation myth busting series
Abstract This article aims to provide insights into achieving situational awareness as a basis for safe automated railway operations. Automation in rail transport has a significant influence on employees' situational awareness (perception, understanding...
Safety Reporting at Renfe
What are the key HOF issues? The Strategic Plan of Renfe contains an ambitious transformation programme based on digitalisation and safety culture. A key aspect of the programme is the development of a confidential reporting system of near misses that...
Evaluation of Human Performance – RSSB
What are the key HOF issues? Despite the ongoing efforts from industry to improve safety and performance, there is an indication that we are now seeing diminishing returns in investments into improvements that the rail industry makes. It is important...
Capturing detailed Human Factors causal data for SPAD events – RSSB
What are the key HOF issues? The Safety Management Intelligence System, known to many as SMIS, is the rail industry’s on-line health and safety reporting and business intelligence software. It collects and provides access to information on thousands of...
HOF in SPADs at Irish Rail
What are the key HOF issues? The immediate cause of signals passed at danger is often a lapse in concentration by a driver on approach to the signal. This can mean that the obvious focus for an investigation is on the actions (or inactions) of the...
ISO: 26800:2011 Ergonomics – General approach, principles and concepts
https://www.iso.org/standard/42885.html
EN 62682 (2015). Management of alarms systems for the process industries
https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/clc/dcee95c4-bf97-4af1-87d3-27e8b34ae480/en-62682-2015
UIC 651 Layout of driver’s cabs in locomotives, railcars, multiple trains and driving trailers
https://www.shop-etf.com/en/layout-of-driver-s-cabs-in-locomotives-railcars-multiple-unit-trains-and-driving-trailers
ISO 9241 – 303: 2011 Ergonomics of human-system interaction – part 303: requirements for electronic visual displays
https://www.iso.org/standard/57992.html
EN 16186 Parts 1 – 4 Railway applications – Driver’s cab
https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/7fb7d01f-4ddd-40e9-a390-0ed2e86ba3c0/en-16186-4-2019
Bainbridge, L. (1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19(6), 775-779.
Abstract This paper discusses the ways in which automation of industrial processes may expand rather than eliminate problems with the human operator. Some comments will be made on methods of alleviating these problems within the ‘classic’ approach of...
Flemisch et al, “Towards a dynamic balance between humans and automation: authority, ability, responsibility and control in shared and cooperative control situations”, Cogn Tech Work (2012) 14:3–18
Abstract: Progress enables the creation of more automated and intelligent machines with increasing abilities that open up new roles between humans and machines. Only with a proper design for the resulting cooperative human–machine systems, these...
CIEHF: Human Factors in Highly Automated Systems
https://ergonomics.org.uk/resource/human-factors-in-highly-automated-systems-white-paper.html
Network Rail: Human Factors Challenges of Automation in Railway Control
https://www.era.europa.eu/sites/default/files/events-news/docs/11_mike_carey_human_factors_challenges_automation_en.pdf
Systra: Traffic Management Systems (TMS) Implementation at Home and Abroad
https://www.systra.com.au/en/newsroom/article/traffic-management-systems-tms-implementation-at-home-and-abroad
Ministry of Defence: Human Factors Integration for Defence Systems
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1061681/JSP912_Part_2.pdf
Gibson, H. (2016). Industry Human Factors SPAD Review: Project Summary Report. London: RSSB.
https://www.sparkrail.org/Lists/Records/DispForm.aspx?ID=22779
Reason, J. (1997) Managing the risk of organisational accidents. Ashgate: Farnham.
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315543543/managing-risks-organizational-accidents-james-reason
RSSB guide on applying Human Factors to Improve Performance
https://www.rssb.co.uk/safety-and-health/improving-safety-health-and-wellbeing/understanding-human-factors/applying-human-factors-to-improve-performance RSSB
Crescencio. A, Martinez. O, Alban Millan. R (2022), “Human error analysis at Valencia railway operation control. Training proposal aimed at reducing human error”
Abstract: The objective of this paper is to present the human factors training methodology in Adif and its theoretical bases. This methodology represents a different way of understanding safety, more focused on what to do and what to know than how to do...
Human and Organisational Factors (HOF) in Railway Automation
Human and Organisational Factors (HOF) in Railway Automation
Join us
Are you interested in HOF?
Do you want to learn about Human & Organisational Factors? Safety culture, non-technical skills, health and safety, more?
Join us on this international and diverse network which captures in one place the valuable and enriching information and material, either academic or practical railways-oriented, on the organizational and human factors that you need.
Are you involved in HOF activities?
You want to learn about Human & Organisational Factors? Safety culture, non-technical skills, health and safety, more?
Join us on this international and transversal network which capitalizes the valuable and enriching information and material, either academic nor Railways oriented, on the organizational and human factors that you need.
Are you an HOF expert?
Are you a Rail Human and Organisational factors expert, a Rail Safety expert, a Railway Head of safety, or other? This space is made for you. Here, you have access to confidential information and can even create or participate in a discussion forum to initiate conversations and exchanges with your peers.